Posted: February 11, 2019
Due Date:
CATEGORY | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 |
Analysis (x2)
|
Specific, developed analysis and insightful observations. |
Analysis is generally sound but could be more specific or insightful in some areas.
|
General and/or undeveloped analysis. |
Analysis is sparse and lacks insight. |
No relevant analysis and insightful observations made. |
Supporting Details
|
Support information is related to analysis and supportive of the topic/subject. |
Support information has minor weaknesses relative to analysis and/or support of the topic/subject. |
Support information has major weaknesses relative to analysis and/or support of the topic/subject. |
An attempt has been made to add support information, but it was unrelated or confusing. |
No support information found or irrelevant. |
Focus & Relevance to Canadian Identity (x2)
|
Maintains focus on topic/subject throughout response. Strong explanation of how painting shows Canadian identity. |
May exhibit minor lapses in focus on topic/subject. Consistent and clear explanation of how this painting represents a Canadian identity. |
May lose or may exhibit major lapses in focus on topic/subject. Begins an explanation of how this painting represents a Canadian identity. |
May fail to establish focus on topic/subject. Minimal mention of Canadian identity represented by painting. |
No analytical focus found. No mention of how painting relates/shows Canadian identity. |
Writing Fluency: Clear, Concise, Correct
|
Demonstrates skillful writing fluency, exhibits few or no mechanical errors. |
Demonstrates reasonable writing fluency, exhibits few mechanical errors. |
Writing fluency is lacking, exhibits several mechanical errors. |
Demonstrates minimal writing fluency, exhibits numerous mechanical errors. |
Writing is not fluent-- unreadable. |